Notice: Undefined index: linkPowrot in C:\wwwroot\wwwroot\publikacje\publikacje.php on line 1275
Publikacje
Pomoc (F2)
[112710] Artykuł:

Utilization of Waste Glass in Autoclaved Silica–Lime Materials

Czasopismo: Materials   Tom: 15, Zeszyt: 2, Strony: 1-14
ISSN:  1996-1944
Opublikowano: Styczeń 2022
 
  Autorzy / Redaktorzy / Twórcy
Imię i nazwisko Wydział Katedra Do oświadczenia
nr 3
Grupa
przynależności
Dyscyplina
naukowa
Procent
udziału
Liczba
punktów
do oceny pracownika
Liczba
punktów wg
kryteriów ewaluacji
Katarzyna Borek orcid logo WBiAKatedra Organizacji Budownictwa i Materiałów Budowlanych *Takzaliczony do "N"Inżynieria lądowa, geodezja i transport5070.0070.00  
Przemysław Czapik orcid logo WBiAKatedra Technologii i Trwałości Betonu *Takzaliczony do "N"Inżynieria lądowa, geodezja i transport5070.0070.00  

Grupa MNiSW:  Publikacja w czasopismach wymienionych w wykazie ministra MNiSzW (część A)
Punkty MNiSW: 140


Pełny tekstPełny tekst     DOI LogoDOI    
Keywords:

waste glass aggregate  container glass  stained glass  autoclaved bricks  autoclaving  SEM  XRD 



Abstract:

This paper aims to investigate the possibility of using waste glass of different colours as a complete substitute for quartz sand in autoclaved silica–lime samples. On the one hand, this increases the possibility of recycling waste glass; on the other hand, it allows obtaining autoclaved materials with better properties. In this research, reference samples with quartz sand (R) and white (WG), brown (BG), and green (GG) waste container glass were made. Parameters such as compressive strength, bulk density, and water absorption were examined on all samples. The samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope with an energy dispersive spectroscopy detector (SEM/EDS) and subjected to X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The WG samples showed 187% higher compressive strength, BG by 159%, and GG by 134% compared to sample R. In comparison to the reference sample, volumetric density was 16.8% lower for sample WG, 13.2% lower for BG, and 7.1% lower for GG. Water absorption increased as bulk density decreased. The WG sample achieved the highest water absorption value, 15.84%. An X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the presence of calcite, portlandite, and tobermorite phases. Depending on the silica aggregate used, there were differences in phase composition linked to compressive strength. Hydrated calcium silicates with varying crystallisation degrees were visible in the microstructure image.