Notice: Undefined index: linkPowrot in C:\wwwroot\wwwroot\publikacje\publikacje.php on line 1275
Strona główna > Publikacje
Publikacje
Pomoc (F2)
[104740] Artykuł:

Credibility of the cadastral data on land use and the methodology for their verification and update

(Wiarygodność danych ewidencyjnych dotyczących użytkowania gruntów oraz metodologia ich weryfikacji i aktualizacji)
Czasopismo: Land Use Policy   Tom: 102
ISSN:  0264-8377
Opublikowano: Marzec 2021
 
  Autorzy / Redaktorzy / Twórcy
Imię i nazwisko Wydział Katedra Do oświadczenia
nr 3		 Grupa
przynależności		 Dyscyplina
naukowa		 Procent
udziału		 Liczba
punktów
do oceny pracownika		 Liczba
punktów wg
kryteriów ewaluacji
Agnieszka Cienciała orcid logo WiŚGiEKatedra Geotechniki, Geomatyki i Gospodarki Odpadami*Niezaliczony do "N"Inżynieria środowiska, górnictwo i energetyka5087.5070.00  
Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska Niespoza "N" jednostki20.00.00  
Szymon Sobura orcid logo WiŚGiEKatedra Geotechniki, Geomatyki i Gospodarki Odpadami*Takzaliczony do "N"Inżynieria środowiska, górnictwo i energetyka3052.5070.00  

Grupa MNiSW:  Publikacja w czasopismach wymienionych w wykazie ministra MNiSzW (część A)
Punkty MNiSW: 140

Pełny tekstPełny tekst     DOI LogoDOI    
Keywords:

Land use  Cadastral data  Photogrammetric products  Orthophotomap  Real estate management  Counting tax  Sustainability  Geospatial technologies 


Abstract:

Land use constitutes a key form of cadastral data. The term ‘land use’ varies across countries and there are many different solutions for registering such data. However, the importance of information on the type of land use has been repeatedly emphasised in the literature on the subject in Poland and other countries. It serves as the basis for taxation, supports urban planning, influences real property values and affects land management procedures. The main rationale behind sustainable management of cities is the systematic and comprehensive credibility verification of the data being the basis for tax calculation – the information on land use contained in the cadastre. The research conducted by the authors revealed that, in many cases, such data are unreliable and outdated, causing significant tax losses in the budget of local government units over the years. However, modern geospatial technologies may facilitate regular verification of such data, providing the ground for the need of their update and therefore reaping future economic benefits for local government units. The results of the research (performed with Phantom 3 Advanced) showed the usefulness of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as a suitable technology for acquiring high-resolution orthophotomap (in the analysed case with a GSD of 3 cm) providing data on the scope of each land use, ensuring the accuracy higher than demanded (≤0.5 m). The obtained spatial resolution of the orthophotomap did not exceed 8 cm.

This publication presents an overview of the regulations and existing literature on the subject, the findings of research on the reliability of cadastral data on land use and the most problematic issues in the field. Model methodology for verifying cadastral data on land use by integrating surveying and photogrammetric materials will also be discussed.


B   I   B   L   I   O   G   R   A   F   I   A
1. Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., Casteleyn, S. 2019. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe, Sustainable Cities and Society 44, 475-487.
2. Antti, R., Ain, K.., Gauk, M., Taki, T. 2013. Land Use Policy shocks in the post-communist urban fringe: A case study of Estonia, Land Use Policy 30, 76-83.
3. Arvanitis, A., Koukopoulou, S. 1999. Managing data during the update of the Hellenic Cadastre, FIG Commission 3 Annual Meeting and Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
4. Arvanitis, A., Koukopoulou, S. Updating Cadastral Data from distance using modern technologies, FIG.
5. Benduch, P. 2019. The study of dependency between land-use coverage and parcel boundaries, Ecological and Environmental Engineering 2018, E3S Web of Conferences 86, 00006.
6. Bieda, A., Parzych, P. 2012. Wpływ zmian linii brzegowych na konfiguracje granic ewidencyjnych (in Polish) [The effect of changes in the borders of rivers for cadastral’s boundaries configuration], Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości 20 (4).
7. Chalkidou, S., Arvanitis, A. 2015. Building a Cellular Automata Model for Land–Use Change Simulation using Cadastral Data – A Case Study in Northern Greece, FIG Working Week 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria.
8. Cichociński, P., Dawidowicz, A., Mika, M., Ogryzek, M., Salata, T., Siejka, M., Ślusarski, M., Wolny, A. 2015. Geoinformation technology and data models, Croatian Information Technology Society, GIS Forum, Zagreb, Croatia.
9. Comparetti, A., Raimondi, S. 2019. Cadastral Models in EU member states, EQA – Environmental quality 33, 55-78.
10. Crommelinck, S., Bennett, R., Gerke, M., Ying Yang, M. and Vosselman, G.. 2017. Contour Detection for UAV-Based Cadastral Mapping, Remote Sensing, 9, 171.
11. Dawidowicz, A., Źróbek, R. 2017. Land administration system for sustainable development – case study of Poland, Real Estate Management and Valuation 25 (1), Olsztyn.
12. Dawidowicz, A., Źróbek, R. 2018. A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model, Land Use Policy 73, 59-72.
13. Drobne, S., Žaucer, T., Foški, M., Zavodnik Lamovšek, A. 2014. Continuous built-up areas as a measure for delineation of urban settlements, Journal of the Association of Surveyors of Slovenia 58 (1), 69-102.
14. EC-INSPIRE. 2011. Spatial Data Infrastructures in Europe: State of play Spring 2011. Spatial Applications Division K.U.Leuven Research & Development.
15. European Environment Agency. 2010. Land in Europe: prices, taxes and use patterns, Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Copenhagen, 23–25.
16. FIG. 1995. The FIG Statement on the Cadastre. FIG Policy Statement, The international Federation of Surveyors (FIG), Copenhagen, Denmark.
17. Grabska, E. 2017. Assessment of a potential use of satellite optical and radar data for the identification of agriculture land types, Prace Geograficzne  148, 135 – 155.
18. Kaczyński, R., Ewiak, I. 2016. Fotogrametria (in Polish) [Photogrammetry], Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Warsaw, 26-36, 169-194.
19. Kisa, A., Ozmus, L., Erkek, B., Ates, H. B., Bakici, S. 2013. Oblique photogrammetry and usage on land administration, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-2/W2.
20. Koeva, M., Muneza, M., Gevaert, C., Gerke M. & Nex F. 2018. Using UAVs for map creation and updating. A case study in Rwanda. Survey review 50 (361), 312-325.
21. Kraus K. 2007. Photogrammetry – Geometry from Images and Laser Scans, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG., Berlin.
22. Kukulska-Kozieł, A., Szylar, M., Cegielska, K., Noszczyk, T., Hernik, J., Gawroński, K., Dixon-Gough, R., Jombach, S., Valanszki, I., Kovacs, K. 2019. Towards three decades of spatial development transformation in two contrasting post-Soviet cities—Kraków and Budapest, Land Use Policy 85, 328–339.
23. Kwartnik-Pruc, A. 2015. Possibilities Of Using Innovative Sources Of Information On Real Estate In The Spatial Data Collection Process, Real Estate Management and Valuation 23 (1), 103-113.
24. Kurczyński Z. 2014. Fotogrametria (in Polish) [Photogrammetry], PWN, Warszawa, 353-361, 378-401, 423-
439, 503-506.
25. Laskowska, E. 2015. Property Tax Systems in Selected European Union Countries and the Proposed Tax Reform in Poland, Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Problems of World Agriculture volume 15 (4), 127–136.
26. Chungan, L., Guofan, S. 2012. Object-oriented classification of land use/cover using digital aerial orthophotography, International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (4), 922-938.
27. Lisec, A., Pišek, J., Drobne, S. 2013. Suitability analysis of land use records of agricultural and forest land for detecting land use change on the case of the Pomurska Statistical Region, Acta geographica Slovenica, 53 (1), 71-90.
28. Luhmann T., Robson, S., Kyle, S., Boehm, J. 2014. Close – Range Photogrammetry and 3D Imaging, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 1058-1065.
29. Mika, M. 2017. Interoperability cadastral data in the system approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering 18 (2), 150–156.
30. Ogryzek, M., Klimach, A., Niekurzak, D., Pietkiewicz, M. 2019. Using Cartographic Documents to Provide Geoinformation on the Rights to Real Estate—Taking Poland as an Example, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (12), 530.
31. Parker J., Newnham L. 2004. Land Management in Australia. Case Study with emphasis on the State of Victoria, UN, FIG, PC IDEA Inter-regional Special Forum on The Building of Land Information Policies in the Americas Aguascalientes, Mexico.
32. Parsova, V. 2011. Development of cadastral system in Latvia. Cadastru şi drept 30.
33. PCC. 2008. Cadastral Information System a resource for the E.U. policies. Overview on the cadastral systemsof the E.U. member states, I-III.
34. Przewięźlikowska A. 2020. Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register, Land Use Policy 95, 1-11.
35. Puniach, E., Bieda, A., Ćwiąkała, P., Kwartnik-Pruc, A., Parzych, P. 2018. Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Updating Farmland Cadastral Data in Areas Subject to Landslides. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (8), 331.
36. Pyka, K., Myszka, P. 2015. Photogrammetry status in the Act of Geodetic and Cartographic Law and connectes regulations, Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji 27, 97-107.
37. Rozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 9 listopada 2011 r. w sprawie standardów technicznych wykonywania geodezyjnych pomiarów sytuacyjnych i wysokościowych oraz opracowywania i przekazywania wyników tych pomiarów do państwowego zasobu geodezyjnego i kartograficznego (in Polish) [Regulation of the Minister of Interior and Administration of 9 November 2011 on the technical standards for performing topographic surveys, and the preparation and delivery of these surveys results to the national land surveying and mapping resource]. Journal of Laws of 2011, No. 263, Item 1572.
38. Rozporządzenie Ministra Rozwoju Regionalnego i Budownictwa z dnia 29 marca 2001 r. w sprawie ewidencji gruntów i budynków (in Polish) [Regulation of the Minister of Regional Development and Construction of 29 March 2001 on the register of land and buildings]. Journal of Laws of 2001, No.38, Item 454, as amended.
39. Sajnóg, N, Sobolewska-Mikulska, K., Wójcik-Leń, J. 2019. Methodology of Determination of the Range of Restrictions Related to the Existence of Transmission Devices on Private Land—Case Study of Poland, Sustainability 11(14).
40. Sun, P., Xu, Y., Yu, Z., Liu, Q., Xie, B., Liu, J. 2016. Scenario simulation and landscape pattern dynamic changes of land use in the Poverty Belt around Beijing and Tianjin: A case study of Zhangjiakou city, Hebei Province, Journal of Geographical Sciences 26 (3), 272-296.
41. Stępień, G., Sanecki, J., Klewski, A., Beczkowski, K. 2016. Determination of agricultural land borders using unmanned aerial systems, Infrastructure and ecology of rural areas, III/2/2016, 1011–1024.
42. Surówka, A. 2000. Analiza kryteriów stabilności granic katastralnych rzek i potoków podstawą próby generacji numerycznej mapy stref zalewowych (in Polish) [Analysis of the stability criteria for cadastral boundaries of rivers and streams as the basis for a numerical generation test of the flood zone map], doctoral dissertation, unpublished thesis, Krakow.
43. Tella, A. 2015. Cadastre and Land Register Maintenance in Finland. FIG Working Week 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria.
44. UNECE. 1996. Land Administration Guidelines With Special Reference to Countries in Transition, New York and Geneva.
45. UNECE, 2002. Workshop on mass valuation systems of land (real estate) for taxation purposes. Report prepared by the delegation of the Russian Federation in cooperation with the secretariat. Economic and Social Council, Geneva, Switzerland.
46. UNECE. 2004. Guidelines on real property units and identifiers. Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland.
47. UNECE. 2005. Land administration in the UNECE Region. Development trends and main principles, New York and Geneva.
48. UNECE. 2014. Survey on Land Administration Systems, New York and Geneva.
49. UNECE. 2015. Key performance indicators for smart sustainable cities to assess the achievement of sustainable development goals, 1603.
50. Ustawa z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 r. o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (in Polish) [Act of 12 January 1991 on taxes and local charges]. Journal of Laws of 1991 No.9, item 31.
51. Ustawa z dnia 15 listopada 1984 r. o podatku rolnym (in Polish) [Act of 15 November 1984 on agricultural tax]. Journal of Laws of 1984 No.52, item 268.
52. Ustawa z dnia 30 października 2002 r. o podatku leśnym (in Polish) [Act of 30 October 2002 on forest tax]. Journal of Laws of 2002 No.200, item 1682.
53. Ustawa z dnia 20 lipca 2017 r. Prawo wodne (in Polish) [Act of 20 July 2017 on the water law]. Journal of Laws of 2017, item 1566.
54. Yaprak S., Yildirim O., Susam T. 2018. New approach for agricultural research and monitoring of land slide: Using of UAV system, Journal of environmental protection 19(1), 246-256.
55. Zarządzenie Ministrów Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Komunalnej z dnia 20 lutego 1969 r. w sprawie ewidencji gruntów (in Polish) [Ordinance of the Ministers of Agriculture and Municipal Economy of 20 February 1969 on land registry]. Monitor Polski of 1969 No.11, Item 98.
56. Źróbek-Różańska, A. 2018. Zarys historyczny i perspektywy przekształceń użytków rolnych na obszarach zurbanizowanych. Studium Olsztyna i jego strefy podmiejskiej (in Polish) [Historical overview and perspectives for transformations of farmlands located in the urbanised areas. Case study of Olsztyn and its suburban area], Problems of Small Agricultural Holdings, No. 1, 127-143.
57. Źróbek-Różańska, A., Zielińska-Szczepkowska, J. 2019. National Land Use Policy against the Misuse of the Agricultural Land—Causes and Effects. Evidence from Poland, Sustainability 11(22), 6403.

POWRÓT
Strona główna > Publikacje