Abstract: In addition to traditional building materials, such as steel and concrete, wood has been gaining increasing prominence in recent years. In the past, the use of wood was limited due to its susceptibility to damage by fungi, insects, and temperature. These shortcomings were gradually eliminated as the quality of wood processing increased and thanks to modern high-quality insulating and protective materials. The return to the utilisation of this natural building material was also supported by the development of new wood-based materials, such as glued laminated wood, and new types of mechanical fasteners, as well as by the introduction of new design methods provided in the Eurocodes. Within this context, this paper focuses on using wood in transport infrastructure, especially as the basic material for footbridges and small road bridges. Combined timber–steel bridges emerge as a very effective type of superstructure in contemporary road bridges and footbridges, especially in areas with natural exposure. Usually, wood is used for the main bridge girders, while steel is preferred for bridge deck elements—stringers and cross-girders. The results of this parametric study offer optimal structural solutions for footbridges with spans of 12.0–24.0 m, reflecting satisfactory static and dynamic footbridge behaviour. Particular attention is paid to a problematic structural detail—the connection between the steel cross-girder and the timber main girder. Firstly, this connection’s characteristics were measured experimentally using nine laboratory samples made of two glued laminated timber blocks, simulating main girders connected with a hot-rolled steel cross-girder. The connection was prepared in three variants, with different heights of the end plates and different numbers of bolts. Subsequently, these characteristics were computed using two numerical FEM models. The first model was created using SCIA Engineer software with a combination of shell and beam finite elements. The second, more sophisticated model was created in the ANSYS software environment using 3D finite elements, allowing us to better take into account the plasticity and orthotropic properties of wood and the points of contact between the individual members. Finally, the experimental results produced by sample testing in the laboratory were compared to the outputs of FEM numerical studies.
B I B L I O G R A F I A1. Structural Timber Association, Technical Bulletin 01—Timber as a Structural Material—An Introduction. Available online: https://www.structuraltimber.co.uk/ (accessed on 28 March 2024).
2. Crocetti, R. Timber Bridges: General Issues, with Particular Emphasis on Swedish Typologies. In Proceedings of the 20th Internationales Holzbau-Forum (IHF 2014), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 3–5 December 2014.
3. EN 1990 Eurocode. Basis of Structural Design. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
4. EN 1995-1-1 Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures—Part 1-1: General Common Rules and Rules for Buildings. CEN: Brussels,Belgium, 2006.
5. EN 1995-2 Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures—Part 2: Bridges. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
6. Juttila, A. Mäkipuro, R. Salokangas, L. Testing a Wood-Concrete Composite Bridge. Struct. Eng. Int. 1997, 7, 275–277. [CrossRef]
7. Gustafsson, M. Two Timber Footbridges, Sweden. Struct. Eng. Int. 1993, 3, 75–76. [CrossRef]
8. Svensson, H.S. Maier, M. Long-Span Pedestrian Timber Truss Bridge Across the Dahme River at Berlin. Innov. Wooden Struct.Bridges 2001, 85, 239–244.
9. Gerold, M. Pedestrian and Cyclic Bridge near Rheinfeld, Germany. Struct. Eng. Int. 2000, 10, 155–157. [CrossRef]
10. Liuzzi, M.A. Fiore, A. Greco, R. Some Structural Design Issues on a Timber Bridge for Pedestrians. OPTARCH 2019, 44, 583–590.
[CrossRef]
11. Pedrazzi, G.Beltrami, C. Design of long span timber footbridge. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design and Dynamic Behaviour of Footbridges, Paris, France, 20–22 November 2002 pp. 1–11.
12. Conzett, J. The Traversina footbridge, Switzerland. Struct. Eng. Int. 1997, 7, 92–94. [CrossRef]
13. USFS. Timber Bridge Manual Minnesota Department of Transportation: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992. Available online: https:
//www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/pdf/insp/USFS-TimberBridgeManual/index.html (accessed on 28 March 2024).
14. Available online: https://puuinfo.fi/puutieto/wooden-bridges/?lang=en (accessed on 28 March 2024).
15. Seppälä, M. Ilgın, H.E. Karjalainen, M. Pajunen, S. An Analysis on Finnish Wooden Bridge Practices. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4325.
[CrossRef]
16. Fojtík, R. Lokaj, A. Gabriel, J. Timber Bridges and Footbridges Monograph (in Czech)
Information Centre of Czech Chamber of Authorized Engineers and Technicians Active in Construction: Prague, Czech Republic, 2017.
17. Zobel, H. Al-Khafaji, T. Contemporary structural solutions of timber pedestrian bridges. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Footbridge 2011, Wroclaw, Poland, 6–8 July 2011 pp. 56–73.
18. Billiszczuk, J. Hawryszków, P. Sułkowski, M. Maury, A. W˛egrzyniak, M. A Cable-Stayed Footbridge Made of Glued-Laminated
Wood—Design, Election and Experimental Investigations. In Dorogi i Mosti [Roads and Bridges] NIDI: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2008
Volume 10, pp. 20–28. Available online: http://dorogimosti.org.ua/en (accessed on 28 March 2024). (In English)
19. Luggin, W.F. Luggin-Erol, K. Historic Timber Bridge System, Böheimkirchen, Austria. Struct. Eng. Int. 2002, 12, 182–184. [CrossRef]
20. Halaczek, B. Knight, M. A New, Sustainable Bridge Form, The Margaretengurtel Bridge, Vienna. In Proceedings of the 4th
International Conference Footbridge 2011, Wroclaw, Poland, 6–8 July 2011 pp. 250–251.
21. Bajzecerová, V. Kánocz, J. Rov ˇnák, M. Kováˇc, M. Prestressed CLT-concrete composite panels with adhesive shear connection. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 56, 104785. [CrossRef]
22. Concrete and Timber Services, Ltd. Available online: https://www.ctsbridges.co.uk/bridges/steel-and-timber/ (accessed on 28 March 2024).
23. CB, Ltd., Kunovice, Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.ekatalog.cz/firma/270267-cb-sro/ (accessed on 28 March 2024).
24. SCIA Engineer. Structural Analysis Software. Available online: https://www.scia.net/en (accessed on 5 January 2023).
25. EN 1991-2 Eurocode 1. Actions on Structures—Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
26. EN 1991-1-4 Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures—Part 1-4: General Actions—Wind Actions. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
27. EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
28. EN 1993-2 Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 2: Steel bridges. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
29. Viˇcan, J. Hlinka, R. Bahleda, F. Lokaj, A. Experimental Verifying of the Timber Bridge Superstructure Behaviour. In Proceedings
of the Conference: Wooden Constructions and Structures Based on Wood, Štramberk, Czech Republic, 11–12 November 2009 pp. 114–119. (In Slovak)
30. ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS Academic Research. Available online: http://www.ansys.com/Industries/Academic (accessed on 28
March 2024).
31. EN 384 Structural Timber. Determination of Characteristic Values of Mechanical Properties and Density. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
32. Odrobiˇnák, J. Viˇcan, J. Establishment of the Component Method for a Semi-rigid Steel-Timber Joint. In Proceedings of the Conference: Timber Structures, Habovka, Slovakia, 3–4 June 2010, pp. 87–92. (In Slovak) 
Pełny tekst 
DOI