Abstract: In ecology and sustainable development, it is important to act not only globally but also locally, so as to
be closer to the daily users of architecture. Responsibility and care for the natural environment and landscape lie at
the heart of sustainable development. Technical educational units and majors related to architecture and urban planning
are invaluable in expanding public awareness in this area. Architectural and urban planning education is of paramount
importance in minimising negative impact on the natural environment, and so is extremely valuable for city residents.
Presented in this article and discussed therein are the results of a survey conducted among architecture students of
engineering studies, who participated in the National Congress of Urban Policy (Kielce, Poland in November 2019).
The survey had two main objectives: the first was to present and evaluate the actions taken by students to protect and
sustain the local environment, and the second was to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching through
practice.
B I B L I O G R A F I A1. Sun, C.J. and Chiou, S.C., The comparison of campus planning development at the initial stage of school
establishment: a study of the two newly instituted private universities of science and technology in Taiwan.
Sustainability, 11, 1525 (2019).
2. Tu, J.C., Liu, L.X. and Wu, K.Y., Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated
Design Education, 5 May 2020, https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2649-d160423.html
3. Kamrowska-Załuska, D. and Parteka, T., Design thinking (DT) for the design and planning education of engineerarchitects. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 18, 2, 97-101 (2020).
4. Mader, M., Mader, C., Zimmermann, F.M., Görsdorf-Lechevin, E. and Diethart, M., Monitoring networking
between higher education institutions and regional actors. J. of Cleaner Produc., 49, 105-113 (2013).
5. Brundtland, G.H., Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, 13
December 2019, http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
6. Vinod Kumar, T.M. and Dahiya, B., Smart Economy in Smart Cities. In: Vinod Kumar, T.M. (Ed), Smart Cities,
Local Community and Socio-Economic Development: the Case of Bologna. Berlin, Germany: Springer (2017).
7. Mardacany, E., Smart cities characteristics: importance of built environment components. Proc. IET Conf. on
Future Intelligent Cities, London, UK, 4-5 December (2014).
8. Anastasiadis, P. and Metaxas, G., Formulating the principles of an eco-city. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol.
Educ.,11, 4, 394-399 (2013).
9. Höjer, M. and Wangel, J., Smart Sustainable Cities Definition and Challenges. In: Hilty, L.M. and Aebischer, B.
(Eds), ICT Innovations for Sustainability, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Zurich, Switzerland:
Springer, 333-349 (2014).
10. Elgazzar, R.F. and El-Gazzar, R.F., Smart Cities, Sustainable Cities, or Both? A Critical Review and Synthesis of
Success and Failure Factors. In: Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems
SCITEPRESS-Science and
Technology Publications. Setúbal, Portugal: Lda, 250-257 (2017).
11. Trindade, E.P., Hinnig, M.P.F., Moreira da Costa, E., Marques, J.S., Bastos, R.C. and Yigitcanlar, T., Sustainable development
of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature. J. of Open Innov. Technol., Market, Complexity, 3, 11 (2017).
12. Kamionka, L., Seruga, W. and Wehle-Strzelecka, S., Architektura Kielc: Teraźniejszość i Perspektywa Jutra.
Kielce: Politechnika Świętokrzyska, Wydawnictwo PŚk (2019) (in Polish).
13. Van Vliet, V. and Kolb, D., Toolshero (2013), 24 May 2020, www.toolshero.com/toolsheroes/david-kolb/
14. Gil-Mastalerczyk, J., Wpływ XX-wiecznej Architektury Sakralnej Kielc na Otoczenie i Przemianę Struktury
Funkcjonalno-przestrzennej Miasta. Kielce: Politechnika Świętokrzyska, Wydawnictwo PŚk (2018) (in Polish).
15. Gil-Mastalerczyk, J., Architectural education in the formation of the built environment with sustainable features.
World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 18, 2, 146-151 (2020).
16. Białkiewicz, A., Propaedeutics of teaching drawing to architects. Global J. of Engng. Educ., 21, 2, 115-120 (2019).
17. Żychowska, M.J., Aesthetics in education at technical universities. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol.
Educ.,18, 1, 40-44 (2020).
18. Oberfrancová, L., Legény, J. and Špaček, R., Critical thinking in teaching sustainable architecture. World Trans.
on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 17, 2, 127-133 (2019).
19. Białkiewicz, A., Architectural competitions support student creativity. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol.
Educ., 18, 2, 157-162 (2020).
20. Ilkovičová, L., Ilkovič, J. and Špaček, R., Ways of rationality and effectivity in architectural education. World
Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 15, 4, 331-337 (2017).
21. Avsec, S. and Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M., Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards technology, engagement in active
learning, and creativity as predictors of ability to innovate. Inter. J. of Engng. Educ., 34, 3, 1049 