Assessing the interdependencies between the production environmental and fiscal activities of European Union industrial enterprises using Structural Equation Modeling

B   I   B   L   I   O   G   R   A   F   I   A1. Pabian, A. Zrównowa˙zone przedsi˛ebiorstwo jako rezultat zmian organizacyjnych, (A sustainable enterprise as a result of organizational change). Przeg. Org. 2017, 11, 11–16.
2. Schaltegger, S. Lüdeke-Freund, F. Hansen, E.G. Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 6, 95–119.
3. Alexopoulos, I. Kounetas, K. Tzelepis, D. Environmental and financial performance. Is there a win-win or a win-loss situation? Evidence from the Greek manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1275–1283.
4. Aslam, S. Elmagrhi, M.H. Rehman, R.U. Ntim, C.G. Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2021, 30, 1655–1673.
5. Rasheed, M.Q. Yuhuan, Z. Haseeb, A. Ahmed, Z. Saud, S. Assessing green energy production and industrial excellence in Asian emerging economies in the context of industrial transformation and sustainable development. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 6, 1123–1146.
6. Jiao, A. Lu, J. Ren, H. Wei, J. The role of AI capabilities in environmental management: Evidence from USA firms. Energy Econ. 2024, 134, 107653.
7. Gandía, J.A.G. Ancillo, A.L. del Núñez, M.T.V. The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge in Enhancing Corporate Sustainability. J. Innov. Knowl. 2025, 10, 100792.
8. Toderas, M. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of AI Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8049.
9. Kim, S. The Effects of Information and Communication Technology, Economic Growth, Trade Openness, and Renewable Energy on CO2 Emissions in OECD Countries. Energies 2022, 15, 2517.
10. Rasheed, M.Q. Yuhuan, Z. Ahmed, Z. Haseeb, A. Saud, S. Information communication technology, economic growth, natural resources, and renewable energy production: Evaluating the asymmetric and symmetric impacts of artificial intelligence in robotics and innovative economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 447, 141466.
11. Adebayo, T.S. Özkan, W. Uzun Ozsahin, D. Eweade, B.S. Gyamfi , B.A. Exploring the role of ICT adoption technologies and renewable energy consumption in achieving a sustainable environment in the United States: An SDGs-based policy framework. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2025, 37, 20.
12. Rasheed, M.Q. Yuhuan, Z. Nazir, M. Ahmed, Z. Yu, X. How do semiconductors, artificial intelligence, geopolitical risk, and their moderating effects shape renewable energy production in leading semiconductor manufacturing countries? Technol. Soc. 2025, 80, 102761.
13. Wang, Q. Li, X. Li, R. Geopolitical risk and environmental footprints: Exploring the moderating roles of AI and energy transition. Energy Environ. 2025, 1, 1–19.
14. Iqbal, A. Zhang, W. Jahangir, S. Building a Sustainable Future: The Nexus Between Artificial Intelligence, Renewable Energy, Green Human Capital, Geopolitical Risk, and Carbon Emissions Through the Moderating Role of Institutional Quality. Sustainability 2025, 17, 990.
15. Rasheed, M.Q. Zhao, Y. Exploring the Impact of Technology Related to Artificial Intelligence, Circular Economy, and Energy Intensity on Sustainable Development Goal 13. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 4, 1–21.
16. Rasheed, M.Q. Yuhuan, Z. Haseeb, A. Ahmed, Z. Saud, S. Asymmetric relationship between competitive industrial performance, renewable energy, industrialization, and carbon footprint: Does artificial intelligence matter for environmental sustainability? Appl. Energy 2024, 367, 123346.
17. Lu, Z. Li, H. Does environmental information disclosure affect green innovation? Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 80, 47–59.
18. Naseer, M.M. Guo, Y. Bagh, T. Zhu, Z. Sustainable investments in volatile times: Nexus of climate change risk, ESG practices, and market volatility. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 95, 103492.
19. Anton, C.E. Baba, C.M. Bucs , oiu, O.-A. Perspectives on Integrating Risk Management and Sustainability for Financial Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3456.
20. Aini, S. Mutmainah, S. Sustainability Reporting and Environmental Innovation in Enhancing Corporate Reputation: A Systematic Literature Review. Eduvest-J. Univers. Stud. 2025, 5, 12489–12497.
21. Schubert, I. Weber, S. Martinez-Cruz, A.L. Burger, P. Farsi, M. Structural Equation Modeling as a Route to Inform Sustainable Policies: The Case of Private Transportation. Front. Sustain. 2022, 3, 837427.
22. Furlan, M. Filho, W. When access to education matters more than income inequality: A structural equation modelling analysis of climate adaptation and mitigation. Environ. Dev. 2025, 57, 101309.
23. Ali, K. Johl, S. Driving sustainability in industry 5.0 through sociotechnical approach of quality management. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2024, 35, 1567–1592.
24. Czvetko, T. Sebestyén, V. Abonyi, J. Key factors of industry 5.0-based organizational sustainability. Technol. Soc. 2025, 83, 102966.
25. Ronaghi, M.H. Scorsone, E. Industry 5.0: The effect of technological innovation on sustainability in manufacturing companies. J. Manag. Anal. 2025, 12, 450–463.
26. Dong, X. Research on the Impact of Media Attention on Corporate ESG Performance-based on the Mediating Effect of Green Innovation. Acad. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2024, 6, 1–6.
27. Zheng, X. Bu, Q. Enterprise ESG Performance, Digital Transformation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. SAGE Open 2024, 14, 1–19.
28. Huang, W.H. The determinants of household electricity consumption in Taiwan: Evidence from quantile regression. Energy 2015, 87, 120–133.
29. Marczewska, M. Kostrzewski, M. Sustainable Business Models: A Bibliometric Performance Analysis. Energies 2020, 13, 6062.
30. Bota-Avram, C. Bibliometric analysis of sustainable business performance: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Econ.Res.-Ekon. Istraz. 2023, 36, 2137–2176.
31. Adam, H. Achsani, N.A. Sembel, R.H.M. Sari, L.K. Bibliometric analysis of business performance dynamics in the infrastructure sector. Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol. 2024, 8, 6335–6359.
32. Bekisz, A. Sus, A. Trzaska, R. Bibliometric analysis of categories of sustainable development. e-mentor 2023, 101, 28–38.
33. Schaltegger, S. Christ, K.L. Wenzig, J.
Burritt, R.L. Corporate sustainability management accounting and multi-level links for sustainability—A systematic review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2022, 24, 480–500.
34. Rahi, F. Johansson, J. Fagerström, A. Blomkvist, M. Sustainability Reporting and Management Control System: A Structured Literature Review. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15, 562.
35. Lippolis, S. Ruggieri, A. Leopizzi, R. Open Innovation for sustainable transition: The case of Enel “Open Power”. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2023, 32, 4202–4216.
36. Robertsone, G. Lapin , a, I. Digital Transformation as a Catalyst for Sustainability and Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100017.
37. Rivo-López, E. Villanueva-Villar, M. Pardo-López, C. Cortés-García, M. Environmental sustainability reporting: A systematic and bibliometric review of two decades of research. Future Bus. J. 2025, 11, 165.
38. Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environ. Conserv. 1987, 1, 291–294.
39. Singh, A. Pope, F.D. Radcliffe, J. Luiu, C. Bakare, H. Bartington, S.E. Bonsu, N.O. Bryson, J.R. Cheeseman, N. Flowe, H. Delivering sustainable climate action: Reframing the sustainable development goals. npj Clim. Action 2024, 1, 110.
40. Trusina, I. Jermolajeva, E. The scientifi c discourse on the concept of sustainable development. East. J. Eur. Stud. 2021, 2, 298–322.
41. Limosani, M. Millemaci, E. Sauvé, P. Do green policies enhance short-term economic growth? Assessing EU Recovery and Resilience Plans through the lens of Sustainable Development Goals. Econ. Model. 2025, 147, 107044.
42. Geissdoerfer, M. Savaget, P. Bocken, N.M.P. Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768.
43. Vilochani, S. Borgianni, Y. McAloone, T.C. Pigosso, D.C.A. An investigation into the extent to which sustainable product development practices are implemented in manufacturing companies. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 50, 155–167.
44. Zimek, M. Baumgartner, R.J. Systemic sustainability assessment: Analyzing environmental and social impacts of actions on sustainable development. Clean. Prod. Lett. 2024, 7, 100064.
45. Prashar, A. Sunder, M.V. A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118665.
46. Ermi¸s, I.S. Ciuciuc, V.E. Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance and firms’ financial performance: A semi-structured literature review, through the lens of sustainable development. Mod. Manag. Syst. 2022, 14, 43–55.
47. Shmelev, S.E. Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Impacts on Financial Returns, Business Model Innovation, and Social Transformation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1286.
48. Hussein, M.A.D. Elobeid, E. Ahmed, E.M. Elfaki, K.E. Bashir, M.S. Sustainable development indicators implications on Saudi Sustainable Economic Growth. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2025, 11, 100587.
49. Hutchins, M.J. Richter, J.S. Henry, M.L. Sutherland, J.W. Development of indicators for the social dimension of sustainability in a U.S. business context. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 687–697.
50. Gian, M. Obydenkova, S.V. van der Meer, Y. Key aspects in the social dimension of sustainability for assessment and reporting. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2025, 57, 183–197.
51. Purvis, B. Mao, Y. Robinson, D. Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695.
52. Quental, N. Lourenço, J. da Silva, F. Sustainability: Characteristics and scientific roots. Environ. Dev. Sustain. Multidiscip. Approach Theory Pract. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 13, 257–276.
53. Caglar, A.E. Demirdag, I. Destek, M.A. Da¸stan, M. Achieving ecological sustainability in European countries: Does low carbon energy lead to a carbon neutrality pathway? Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 958, 177915.
54. Jeurissen, R. Review of Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. J. Bus. Ethics 2000, 23, 229–231.
55. Sahu, A. Agrawal, S. Kumar, G. Triple bottom line performance of manufacturing Industry: A value engineering approach. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103029.
56. Nogueira, E. Gomes, S. Lopes, J.M. Unveiling triple bottom line’s influence on business performance. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 43.
57. Roberts, C. Geels, F.W. Lockwood, M. Newell, P. Schmitz, H. Turnheim, B. Jordan, A. The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 44, 304–311.
58. Marquardt, J. Pfeiffer, F. Blum, M. Daw, T.M. Dugasseh, F.A. Heitzig, J. Hysing, E. Jensen, I.H.A. Kulha, K. Langkjær, F. Reconciling democracy and sustainability: Three political challenges and the role of democratic innovations. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2025, 21, 2504239.
59. Schöggl, J.P. Rusch, M. Stumpf, L. Baumgartner, R.J. Implementation of digital technologies for a circular economy and sustainability management in the manufacturing sector. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 35, 401–420.
60. Oghazi, P. Mostaghel, R. Hultman, M. International industrial manufacturers: Mastering the era of digital innovation and circular economy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2024, 201, 123160.
61. Prashar, A. Towards sustainable development in industrial small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An energy sustainability approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 977–996.
62. Wang, H. Li, B. Environmental regulations, capacity utilization, and high-quality development of manufacturing: An analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19566.
63. Haleem, A. Javaid, M. Singh, R.P. Suman, R. Qadri, M.A. A pervasive study on Green Manufacturing towards attaining sustainability. Green Technol. Sustain. 2023, 1, 100018.
64. Ulbrych, M. Progress in Achieving Sustainable Industrial Development–the Case of the Czech Republic and Poland. Comp. Econ. Res. 2020, 23, 109–128.
65. Shen, Y. Zhang, X. Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16749.
66. Mair, S. Jones, A. Ward, J. Christie, I. Druckman, A. Lyon, F. A Critical Review of the Role of Indicators in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. In Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research Leal Filho, W., Ed. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018 pp. 41–56.
67. Slaper, T. Hall, T.J. The Triple Bottom Line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana Bus. Rev. 2011, 86, 4–8.
68. Blits, J. Yegoryan, N. Mandler, T. Burmester, A.B. Speaking of Sustainability. . . The Triple Bottom Line in Firm and User-Generated Content. Schmalenbach J. Bus. Res. 2025, 77, 557–584.
69. Mishra, P. Pandey, V.K. Triple bottom line and environmental sustainability: Evolution of global ESG research A bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2025, 37, 136.
70. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. General Assembly
United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
71. Elder, M. Grünewald, S. Insights from Agenda 21 for enhancing the implementation of the SDGs and shaping the Post-2030 sustainable development agenda. Earth Syst. Govern. 2025, 25, 100262.
72. Assubayeva, A. Marco, J. Methodological approaches on synergies and trade-offs within the 2030 Agenda. iScience 2024, 27, 111100.
73. Raworth, K. Defining a Safe and Just Space for Humanity. In State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible? Raworth, K., Ed. Island Press Center for Resource Economics: Washington, DC, USA, 2013 pp. 28–38.
74. Duran, D.C. Gogan, L.M. Artene, A. Duran, V. The Components of Sustainable Development—A Possible Approach. Procedia Econ. Finance 2015, 26, 806–811.
75. Del Vasto, P.H. The three pillars of sustainability trends: A bibliometric analysis. Eur. Public Soc. Innov. Rev. 2024, 9, 1–18.
76. Waage, J. Banerji, R. Campbell, O. Chirwa, E. Collender, G. Dieltiens, V. Dorward, A. Godfrey-Faussett, P. Hanvoravongchai, P. Kingdon, G. et al. The Millennium Development Goals: A cross-sectoral analysis and principles for goal setting after 2015. Lancet 2010, 376, 991–1023.
77. Lu, Z. Gou, D. Yang, L. Wu, Z. Feng, H. The impact of environmental tax reform on industrial green development: Evidence from China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1593549.
78. Ren, X. Mia, M.A. The determinants of green innovations in manufacturing industries: A systematic literature review. Futur. Bus. J. 2025, 11, 42.
79. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Environmental protection tax, green innovation, and environmental, social, and governance performance. Finance Res. Lett. 2024, 65, 105592.
80. Shi, Y. Ge, J. The role of government fiscal and tax incentives in green technology innovation and enterprise development: Implications for human health and hygiene. Front. Public Health 2025, 12, 1502856.
81. Dechezleprêtre, A. Kozluk, T. Kruse, N.D. de Serres, A. Do Environmental and Economic Performance Go Together? A Review of Micro-level Empirical Evidence from the Past Decade or So. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2019, 13, 1–118.
82. Biscione, A. Boccanfuso, D. De Felice, A. Regulations and Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Evidence from a panel of firms in Transition economies. Appl. Econ. 2021, 53, 6286–6299.
83. Xie, B. Yang, C. Song, W. Song, L. Wang, H. The impact of environmental regulation on capacity utilization of China’smanufacturing industry: An empirical research based on the sector level. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 148, 110085.
84. Luo, G. Guo, J. Yang, F. Wang, C. Environmental regulation, green innovation and high-quality development of enterprise: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 418, 138112.
85. Duan, Y. Rahbarimanesh, A. The Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Green Innovation of Heavily Polluting Enterprises in China: A Mediating Role Based on ESG Performance. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7509.
86. Valero-Gil, J. Surroca, J.A. Tribo, J.A. Gutierrez, L. Montiel, I. Innovation vs. standardization: The conjoint effects of ecoinnovation and environmental management systems on environmental performance. Res. Pol. 2023, 52, 104737.
87. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. Environment versus growth—A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 881–890. [CrossRef]
88. Jayashree, S. Reza, M.N.H. Malarvizhi, C.A.N. Mohiuddin, M. Industry 4.0 implementation and Triple Bottom Line sustainability: An empirical study on small and medium manufacturing firms. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07753.
89. Machado, E.A. Scavarda, L.F. Caiado, G.G. Santos, R.S. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Integration in the Supply Chains of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises through People, Process, and Technology within the Triple Bottom Line Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1141.
90. Burström, T. Lahti, T. Parida, V. Wincent, J. Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2024, 208, 123656.
91. Girma, L. Oduro, S. Cucari, N. Cristofaro, M. Venturing green: The impact of sustainable business model innovation on corporate environmental performance in social enterprises. Manag. Res. Rev. 2025, 48, 20–44.
92. Wuni, I.Y. Burden of proof beyond the triple bottom line: Mapping the benefits of circular construction. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 34, 528–540.
93. Ferrer-Serrano, M. Salesa, A. Revisiting the Circular Economy Paradox: A Triple Bottom Line Perspective. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 33, 7526–7545.
94. Rigby, D. Elk, S. Berez, S. The Agile C-Suite: A new approach to leadership for the team at the top. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2020, 3, 66–75.
95. O’Reilly, C.A. Tushman, M.L. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2013, 27, 324–338.
96. Kang, A.S. Hew, S.L. Sustainable ESG practices and smart manufacturing adoption readiness for SME operational agility: The conditional mediating role of financial access. Sustain. Futures 2025, 10, 101081.
97. Taticchi, P. Demartini, M. A Modern Definition of Corporate Sustainability. In Management for Professionals, Corporate Sustainability in Practice
Taticci, P., Demartini, M., Eds. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021 pp. 65–74.
98. Demartini, M. Taticchi, P. Performance measurement and management. A literature review focussed on the role played by management theories with a deep dive into the industry 4.0 environment. Internat. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2021, 71, 1008–1033.
99. Hilson, G. Murck, B. Sustainable development in the mining industry: Clarifying the corporate perspective. Resour. Policy 2000, 26, 227–238.
100. Edgeman, R. Neely, A. Eskildsen, J. Paths to sustainable enterprise excellence. J. Model. Manag. 2016, 11, 858–868.
101. Bajdor, P. Pawełoszek, I. Fidlerova, H. Analysis and Assessment of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in Polish Small and Medium Enterprises. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3595.
102. Ong, T. Lee, A. Teh, B. Turning Environmental Strategies into Competitive Advantage in the Malaysian Manufacturing Industry: Mediating Role of Environmental Innovation. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 29, 1293–1312.
103. Gittell, R. Magnusson, M. Merenda, M. The Sustainable Business Case Book Flat World Knowledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013 p. 390.
104. Binder, J. Haanaes, K. Leading the Sustainable Business Transformation: A Playbook from IMD Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025 p. 400.
105. Sarfraz, M. Ivascu, L. Artene, A.E. Bobitan, N. Dumitrescu, D. Bogdan, O. Burca, V. The relationship between firms’ financial performance and performance measures of circular economy sustainability: An investigation of the G7 countries. Econ. Res. Istraz. 2023, 36, 2101019.
106. Binder, J. The Circular Business Revolution: A Practical Framework for Sustainable Business Models Pearson: Harlow, UK, 2024.
107. Parrish, B.D. Designing the sustainable enterprise. Futures 2007, 39, 846–860.
108. Brandi, U. Christensen, P. Sustainable organisational learning—A lite tool for implementing learning in enterprises. Ind. Commer. Train. 2018, 50, 356–362.
109. Lassala, C. Orero-Blat, M. Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. The financial performance of listed companies in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Econ. Res. Istraz. 2021, 34, 427–449.
110. Salimi, N. Vrauwdeunt, T. Sustainability: Does it contribute to the survival of entrepreneurship? J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123454.
111. Stahl, G.K. Brewster, C.J. Collings, D.G. Hajro, A. Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100708.
112. Garcia-Castro, R. Aguilera, R.V. Incremental Value Creation and Appropriation in a World with Multiple Stakeholders. Strat. Manag. J. 2015, 36, 137–147.
113. Ullah, M. Rahman, H.U. Kaj, S.H. Zahid, M. Mirza, M.Z. Rehman, S. Does firms’ economic performance affect social and environmental performance with the mediation of the green image? Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100721.
114. Berrone, P. Gomez-Mejia, L.R. The PROS and CONS of rewarding social responsibility at the top. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2009, 48, 959–971.
115. Dyck, A. Lins, K.V. Roth, L. Wagner, H.F. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financ. Econ. 2019, 131, 693–714.
116. Henriques, A. Richardson, J. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up Routledge: London, UK, 2005.
117. Willard, B. The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line New Society Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
118. Gu, W. Pan, H. Hu, Z. Liu, Z. The Triple Bottom Line of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Economic Policy Uncertainty: An Empirical Evidence from 22 Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7758.
119. Azmat, F. Lim, W.M. Moyeen, A. Voola, R. Gupta, G. Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 167, 114170.
120. Nica, I. Chirit, ă, N. Georgescu, I. Triple Bottom Line in Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1932.
121. Hametner, M. Kostetckaia, M. Frontrunners and laggards: How fast are the EU member states progressing towards the sustainable development goals? Ecol. Econ. 2020, 177, 106775.
122. Ambec, S. Lanoie, P. Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview. Acad. Manag. Perspec. 2008, 22, 45–62.
123. Borsatto, J.M.L.S. Amui, L.B.L. Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 445–454.
124. Aragón-Correa, J.A. Sharma, S. A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Acad. Manag.
Rev. 2003, 28, 71–88.
125. Roscoe, S. Subramanian, N. Jabbour, C.J.C. Chong, T. Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2019, 28, 737–749.
126. Montalvo-Falcón, J.V. Sánchez-García, E. Marco-Lajara, B. Martínez-Falcó, J. Green human resource management and economic, social and environmental performance: Evidence from the Spanish wine industry. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20826.
127. Jabbour, C.J.C. de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: Linking two emerging agendas. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1824–1833.
128. AlQershi, N. Mokhtar, S.S.M. Abas, Z. The relationship between strategic innovations, human capital and performance: An empirical investigation. Sustain. Futures 2021, 3, 100056.
129. Silva, G.M. Gomes, P.J. Sarkis, J. The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2019, 28, 819–832.
130. Barros, M.V. Salvador, R. do Prado, G.F. de Francisco, A.C. Piekarski, C.M. Circular economy as a driver to sustainable businesses. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2021, 2, 100006.
131. Garcia-Torres, S. Albareda, L. Rey-Garcia, M. Seuring, S. Traceability for sustainability–literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 85–106.
132. Klopp, E. Klößner, S. The impact of scaling methods on the properties and interpretation of parameter estimates in structural equation models with latent variables. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2021, 28, 182–206.
133. Kwan, J.L.Y. Chan, W. Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: A model parameterization approach. Behav. Res. Methods 2011, 43, 730–745.
134. Brown, T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA
London, UK, 2015.
135. Roos, J.M. Bauldry, S. Confirmatory Factor Analysis SAGE Publications Inc.: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2022.
136. Schreiber, J.B. Nora, A. Stage, F.K. Barlow, E.A. King, J. Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. J. Educ. Res. 2006, 99, 323–337.
137. Millar, R.B. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference: With Examples in R, SAS and ADMB Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2011.
138. Sarstedt, M. Hair, J.F. Ringle, C.M. Thiele, K.O. Gudergan, P. Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! J. Bus.Res. 2016, 69, 3998–4010.
139. Afthanorhan, A. Awang, Z. Aimran, A. Arifi n, J. An Extensive Comparison Between CBSEM and Consistent PLS-SEM on Producing the Estimates of Construct Correlation in Applied Research. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1874, 012083.
140. Hair, J.F., Jr. Hult, G.T.M. Ringle, C.M. Sarstedt, M. Danks, N.P. Ray, S. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021.
141. Sarstedt, M. Hair, J.F., Jr. Ringle, C.M. ‘PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet’—Retrospective observations and recent advances. J. Mark. Theory Pr. 2023, 31, 261–275.
142. Guenther, P. Guenther, M. Ringle, C.M. Zaefarian, G. Cartwright, S. PLS-SEM and reflective constructs: A response to recent criticism and a constructive path forward. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2025, 128, 1–9.
143. Carrión, G.C. Nitzl, C. Noonan, R. Mediation Analyses in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines and Empirical Examples. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Latan, H., Noonan, R., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017 pp. 173–195.
144. Ringle, C.M. Sarstedt, M. Sinkovics, N. Sinkovics, R.R. A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data Brief 2023, 48, 109074.
145. Richter, N.F. Hauff, S. Ringle, C.M. Gudergan, S.P. The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling andComplementary Methods in International Management Research. Manag. Int. Rev. 2022, 62, 449–470.
146. Hair, J.F. Ringle, C.M. Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152.
147. Astrachan, C.B. Patel, V.K. Wanzenried, G. A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. J. Fam. Bus. Strat. 2014, 5, 116–128.
148. Henseler, J. Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Qual. Quant. 2018, 52, 1–8.
149. Flora, D.B. Crone, G. Bell, S.M. Effect Size Interpretation in Structural Equation Models. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 2025, 41, 1069–1076.
150. Dash, G. Paul, J. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chan. 2021, 173, 121092.
151. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023.
152. Marcoulides, G.A. Raykov, T. A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling Psychology Press: Mahwah, NY, USA, 2006.
153. Vukovi´c, M. CB-SEM vs. PLS-SEM comparison in estimating the predictors of investment intention. Croat. Oper. Res. Rev. 2024,15, 131–144.
154. Tengfei, L. Ullah, A. Impact of fiscal policies and green financing on firm innovation and firm value for green economic recovery. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30145.
155. Liu, M. Yaacob, M.H. Ma, Q. Ding, S. Green Finance and Corporate Green Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open 2025, 15, 21582440251370800.
156. Badarau, C. Chodakowska, A. Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. Paparas, D. New strategies for sustainable growth in European Economies. East. Eur. Econ. 2023, 61, 311–317.
157. Porter, M.E. van der Linde, C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9, 97–118.
158. Epstein, M.J. Roy, M.J. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers. Long Range Plan. 2001, 34, 585–604.
159. Maria, T.A. Sustainable Development, A Multidimensional Concept. Ann. Econ. Ser. 2015, 1, 82–86.
160. Olofsson, K.L. Fitzgerald, J.B. Hossain, M.B. Assessing multi-dimensional complexity through sustainability modeling: A whole community approach. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2025, 164, 104002.
161. del Brío González, J.A. Fernández, E. Junquera, B. Management and Employee Involvement in Achieving an Environmental Action-Based Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manag. 2007, 18, 491–522.
162. Gómez-Bezares, F. Przychodzen, W. Przychodzen, J. Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Wealth - Evidence from British Companies and Lessons from the Crisis. Sustainability 2016, 8, 276.
163. Gao, L. Wan, L. Does corporate environmental responsibility contribute to financial performance? A dual path analysis through operational efficiency and the cost of debt. Corpor. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag. 2023, 30, 308–323.
164. Ullah, B. Corporate environmental responsibility and financial constraints for unlisted SMEs. Glob. Financ. J. 2025, 67, 101176.
165. Hair, J. Hult, G.T.M. Ringle, C.M. Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling SAGE Publications, Inc.: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2022.
166. Elkington, J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 1998, 8, 37–51.
167. Loviscek, V. Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review. Rev. Admin. Contemp. 2021, 25, e200017.
168. Sachs, J.D. Ki-moon, B. The Age of Sustainable Development Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
169. Prokop, V. Gerstlberger, W. Zapletal, D. Striteska, M.K. The double-edged role of firm environmental behaviour in the creation of product innovation in Central and Eastern European countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 331, 129989.
170. Satrovic, E. Zafar, M.W. Suntraruk, P. Achieving ecological sustainability in European Union: The role of fiscal decentralization and green innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 445, 141316.
171. Tschelisnig, G. Westerlaken, R. The impact of sustainability at the workplace on the employee’s motivation and satisfaction. Res.Hosp. Manag. 2022, 12, 177–181.
172. Acciarini, C. Li, H. Saleem, S.F. Mone, F. Balancing Progress and Sustainability: Industrial Innovation’s Impact on Europe’s Emission Management, Economic Expansion, and Financial Growth. J. Econ. Forecast. 2023, 1, 129–147.